11 Jan
2008
11 Jan
'08
1:47 a.m.
Pat wrote...
I think that Julian was referring to it "getting
through" to cctech, not
cctalk.
Because Evan wrote...
> This "crap" SHOULD get through. It's
a perfectly okay example of
> something that's off-topic but still related to historic technology.
Because Julian wrote...
> This is precisely the reason I unsubscribed from
cctalk and
> subscribed to cctech. Yet, crap like this still gets through. Suck.
Ya'll 'r nuts. Making a vacuum tube strikes me as rather on-topic and if I
happened to be doing moderation that day - I sure would have passed that
through to cctech.
But that's just me, and not important. What *IS* important is that Lawrence
works damn hard for a lot of thankless hours gating stuff from cctalk to
cctech, and I don't want to hear any complaints about one or two things
slipping through even if they ARENT on topic. Ya'll owe him some gratitude,
not recrimination.
Jay