7 Nov
2007
7 Nov
'07
5:25 p.m.
> But a 68K is a whole lot more CPU than an 8086.
One might even argue
> that it's more CPU than a 286.
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, woodelf wrote:
Make that a 386 and you got a fact.The 68K is 32 bit
cpu,none of this
16 bit wantabe's.
How do we DEFINE "a 32 bit CPU"?
Would we consider a 386SX to be a "32 bit CPU"?