just outta curiosity

Revisionism is fine as long as you have the documentation, 1st hand accounts, and anything else to back it up. One problem with being a participant though, especially if it's something on a grand scale, is that rarely do you get to see anything other than the smallest piece of the pie. One has to wonder though how much of what is written as 'factual history' would actually be proved wrong if more hard core data was available? A good example is the Dynalogic Hyperion and Commodore link. During my initial research on the machine, I found vague references to the possibility that Commodore had at least thought of producing them. Not even Jim Brain's site had anything hard on the connection. Then a few months later I started talking to an ex-Commodore UK employee and he explained the link to me, which I've documented on my page. Granted, it's not written documentation, but it is direct from someone who is said to have been part of it. Not a big piece of the puzzle, but saved from nearly being forgotten all the same.