On Mar 26, 2021, at 3:38 PM, Bill Degnan via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 3:35 PM Al Kossow via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
wrote:
On 3/26/21 12:31 PM, Guy Fedorkow via cctalk
wrote:
wow, what format?
The codes I'm punching should line up with a long-dead machine,
Whirlwind from MIT, so I think you'd consider them to be 7-track binary,
i.e., same size as an 8-track teletype tape with one track blank
Real Whirlwind tape is narrower than standard 1" paper tape.
The reason I have not offered to do this is the blank tape that I
have would not be period correct, nor the right width.
Is it baudot width? If so someone in the Greenkeys mailing list can help.
Or they'd be able to help regardless. I can print standard 1 inch tapes, I
have a working Teletype right here in my office. Because that's what
normal people have, right?
The most common widths are for 5 ("baudot") and 8 (ascii) tape, which have that
number of tracks plus a sprocket track on 0.1 inch centers, closely filling the available
space. But there is also 6-track tape (for typesetting machines) and 7 track (for some
very old machines) that have paper width to match -- same track spacing, different track
count. Those are rarely seen but specs for them can be found, I tripped over them not too
long ago.
Then for something nice and obscure there is 2-track tape ("Wheatstone") for
punched Morse code. Creed and MacElroy (in Littleton, MA) made machines for that.
paul