-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at
classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-bounces at
classiccmp.org]
On Behalf Of Mouse
Sent: Sunday, 6 May 2012 2:12 PM
To: cctalk at
classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: What's the point of USB keyboards+mice = Re: EPROM and EEPROM
>> I agree with him. USB is great for
hardware makers, since it
>> enforces obsolescence, thus ensuring a stream of new sales [...]
> No more than any standard does. USB has been around for a long time
> now, the Molotovs and placards are a bit on the late side.
But the discussion isn't how long USB has had
a spec, or how long it's
existed on the lab bench. It's about its appearance in mass-market
machines, ...
What the USB naysayers haven't said though is exactly why USB is not
suitable for keyboards and mice.
I agree. All keyboards and mice (from original PC) had a micro controller in them
(original was 8048). So arguing that USB *requires* more intelligence (as in the AT/PS2
keyboard/mouse doesn't) is wrong. OK, the stack is a little more involved but hard
coding a stack for a simple device isn't all that hard.
What USB does do, is (and what Apple and other MFR's have followed suit albeit more
slowly)