-----Original Message-----
 From: cctalk-bounces at 
classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-bounces at 
classiccmp.org]
 On Behalf Of Mouse
 Sent: Sunday, 6 May 2012 2:12 PM
 To: cctalk at 
classiccmp.org
 Subject: Re: What's the point of USB keyboards+mice = Re: EPROM and EEPROM
 >> I agree with him.  USB is great for
hardware makers, since it
>> enforces obsolescence, thus ensuring a stream of new sales [...]
> No more than any standard does.  USB has been around for a long time
> now, the Molotovs and placards are a bit on the late side. 
  But the discussion isn't how long USB has had
a spec, or how long it's
 existed on the lab bench.  It's about its appearance in mass-market
 machines, ... 
 What the USB naysayers haven't said though is exactly why USB is not
 suitable for keyboards and mice. 
 I agree.  All keyboards and mice (from original PC) had a micro controller in them
 (original was 8048).  So arguing that USB *requires* more intelligence (as in the AT/PS2
 keyboard/mouse doesn't) is wrong.  OK, the stack is a little more involved but hard
 coding a stack for a simple device isn't all that hard.
 What USB does do, is (and what Apple and other MFR's have followed suit albeit more
 slowly)