2 Oct
2010
2 Oct
'10
12:23 p.m.
On 2 Oct 2010 at 11:52, Eric Smith wrote:
I'm confused. Which patent are you saying should
qualify as prior art?
The Sun patent is fairly recent, so it can't qualify as prior art with
respect to the older patents we've mentioned.
It's hard to believe that the approach used in the Sun patent hadn't
been used commercially before. That's what I meant by "prior art".
--Chuck