On Sat, 5 Mar 2005, M H Stein wrote:
I don't
consider my response either rude or condescending.
-------------------------------------
Well, the tone of your posts has itself been the subject of several OT
threads, but we love ya anyway.
====================================================
The rest of my reply to Sellam is off-list, except for:
I think my main point is that, as historians, museum curators, technical
resource people etc., maybe we have a special responsibity to present
a friendly, helpful and more or less mature attitude to the outside world,
*especially* in contrast to some of the other lists around.
I realize my tone at times can be gruff or even seem gruff, and in this
case the latter was probably the case even if I'm not willing to admit to
the former. At any rate, Jim has been with us long enough to know that
this is NOT a mailing list for general computer discussions (and pleading
ignorance to this is not a good excuse) and that we overall take a dim
view to these sorts of questions. If Jim was a newbie then I certainly
would have been more humane in my reply. But he's been subscribed for at
least half a year. He knows the deal.
Why? As was already mentioned, it's a slippery slope. You let one
question through, OK. But then Cornelius figures since Aloysius was
able to ask a generic PC support question, and it got answered, why
shouldn't he? So Cornelius asks and he receives. Next thing you know,
Hortense needs to know how to do some mundane PC maintenance thing that
also has nothing to do with vintage computing and poses the question,
etc., etc., and before you know it we are zipping down the mountainside at
70MPH towards a mailing list that has no former resemblance to its title,
the CLASSIC COMPUTERS mailing list. THERE IS NOTHING CLASSIC ABOUT MAKING
WINDOWS XP RUN ON YOUR LAPTOP AND NOR WILL IT SUBJECTIVELY BE FOR DOZENS
OF YEARS!
Now, you may be thinking, "Oh, Sellam. You are so dramatic. This won't
happen." To which I would reply, you're damn right, because I'm not going
to let it happen.
In thinking about it, the split between CCTALK and CCTECH, and the
discussions on why it came about, can be confusing to anyone who hasn't
been here since the beginning and understands the historical reasons
behind the split. I can see how people can become confused by the
"Off-topic/On-topic" dual nature of the split list. I think we need to
make it a bit more clear that even though it's subtitled "On-Topic and
Off-Topic Posts", this does not give carte blanche to talk about whatever
one feels. What it means is:
If you ONLY want to discuss vintage computing and you ONLY want to read
postings of that nature, you subscribe to CCTECH, which only presents
moderated messages. If you don't mind the occasional off-topic banter
(and there is plenty) and do appreciate a more relaxed conversational
forum, then you can subscribe to CCTALK where posts are not moderated.
HOWEVER, under NO circumstances is it to be perceived that the phrase
"off-topic" included in the subtitle of CCTALK implies that you are
allowed to go off-topic! In the very least, you should not expect it to
be a shield against the flamage that will be blasted your way when you
post a blatantly off-topic message. All it means is that the OCCASIONAL
off-topic message is tolerated because those joining this list have agreed
to be dispositioned towards them thusly (and only then to a LIMITED
extent!), but they are still NOT ALLOWED.
Throw that in the FAQ and make every newbie read it and agree to it.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger
http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at
www.VintageTech.com || at
http://marketplace.vintage.org ]