14 Jul
1999
14 Jul
'99
9:09 p.m.
On Wed, 14 Jul 1999 allisonp(a)world.std.com wrote:
If you don't mind the horrible quality you get with an instant camera. I
have a pretty decent instant from Polaroid (I forget the model) and even
it doesn't output very good pictures, especially not what I would settle
for on a website.
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't rub the lamp if you don't want the genie to come out.
Coming this October 2-3: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0!
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 05/25/99]
c) using an
ordinary camera and scanning the prints.
Pro: - Cheapest solution (imidiate or in mid range if
a scanner has to be purchased)
- Resolution at least as good as with an customer range
digital camera
Con: - No short turn around cycle - you'll have to wait
for the prints and scan them
- most work (you'll have to scan them)
E) do as in D but use a polaroid camara for the prints.