9 Dec
2012
9 Dec
'12
9:14 a.m.
On 12/9/2012 11:57 AM, Joost van de Griek wrote:
On 9 dec. 2012, at 00:45, "Zane H.
Healy"<healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
please explain what you mean by "scanning them wet"....
Steve
I have an ancient 300dpi UMAX scanner out in
the garage, useless for most things, EXCEPT, it has a full size transparency adapter and I
could use it to scan 8x10 sheet film.
I'd consider scanning sheet film at 300 dpi a waste of effort.
You'll surely get much better results scanning them wet on a modern, high dpi
flatbed.
.tsooJ