To me there are a number of aspects.
Equipment makers part number to actual part number
eg HP 1820-xxxx 74lsxxx there are some lists you can start to
populate your database
Component manufacturers second sourcing
eg a Texas SN74xx to National DM74xx
A work alike and can be used to replace some specs may be better
NEC V20 (?PD70108) was a processor made by NEC that was a
reverse-engineered, pin-compatible version of the Intel 8088 and see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NEC_V20
Functional work alike but needs thought on fitting
eg changing series from 74 to 74F to get something working.
And cases where a component was a failure and dropped in favor of an
improved b version
sometimes including circuit modifications
The possibilities are almost endless, the amount of data entry is
huge, I did start with an HP parts table some years ago myself but
other stuff got done instead.
Dave Caroline
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Geoffrey Reed <geoffr at zipcon.net> wrote:
Hey! ?I?m sick and tired of trying to find a good Xref
database for
componants, and am considering making my own. ?What information do you
consider critical in cross referencing a part?