> > The first alternative works very well
indeed. The second won't,
though.
> > Macs use hard drives with a particular Apple
firmware, without which
HD SC
Utility won't recognise the drive. Bloody stupid.
Another Apple
peculiarity would be its lack of support for remote start in
SCSI, so the hard drives will need to jumpered for automatic start on
power, but this won't affect other systems.
Non-Apple drives work quite well with Macs; however, while your
observation about the use of Apple's HD SC Utility is correct,
all non-Apple SCSI drives sold *FOR* the Mac come with their
own SCSI setup utility.
Granted, I forgot to mention that there are other SCSI setup utilities,
but why in the world would one need to buy a drive /for/ a particular
brand of computer? A hard drive is a hard drive is a hard drive.
Because the computer manufacturer's engineers, in their infinite wisdom,
decided their computer needed feature <X>...
For Pr1me minis, hard drives have to be able to support a sector size
of 2080 bytes, instead of or in addition to the usual 512-byte sector
support. With Apple, their *first* hard drive (a non-SCSI unit) had
things called disk tags that required drives that support a sector
size of 576 bytes (from memory, probably wrong).
I'm not defending the practice; while I assumed your remark was
rhetorical, not everyone in the audience may be as well-informed
as we are.
For a SCSI
drive *NOT* sold _for_ a Mac, you'd need a third-party
toolkit like FWB' Hard Disk Tools (or whatever it's called). I've
used it to add IBM and DEC SCSI drives to a Mac.
I've got an Apple-edition IBM drive in a IIcx here. =)
I've got one of those, too, and it looks *just* like the
non-Apple edition. Scary...
-dq