23 Apr
2002
23 Apr
'02
5:17 a.m.
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Ben Franchuk wrote:
"Peter C. Wallace" wrote:
The int size is not a big deal and can easily be worked around. Macros can
easily do the needed range checking, sign extension, etc etc...
Peter Wallace
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Richard Erlacher wrote:
SNIP-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless you have say a 12 or 18 bit computer... most table assemblers are
16 or 32 bit
ints.
--
Ben Franchuk - Dawn * 12/24 bit cpu *
www.jetnet.ab.ca/users/bfranchuk/index.html
Well, you CAN design in a core for which
you've already got an assembler.
Also, if you use a table driven assembler, it takes all of about 20
minutes to generate a table for a totally new architecture...
Peter Wallace