With no sector ring, it could not be hard sectored. That means either soft
sectored or intended to store analog data.
The 2315 pack is indeed what the RK series was set up for. It is also what
the IBM 1130 used. I had no idea that any 360 systems had used them. From
what I read at
the /44 was an
odd beast (as was the /20).
Jay Jaeger
At 09:45 AM 1/5/2005 -0500, Paul Koning wrote:
>>>> "Ashley" == Ashley Carder <wacarder(a)usit.net> writes:
Ashley> A couple months ago I acquired a new, still in the plastic
Ashley> wrap, still in the box, never opened disk pack that at first
Ashley> glance appeared to be an RK05. I finally decided to look
Ashley> further at it to see if it was a 12 sector or 16 sector RK05
Ashley> pack, since it had no identifying label or markings.
Ashley> Upon further inspection, I found that it did not have the
Ashley> usual rim on the hub, where normally you would be able to
Ashley> count the thin notches to determine whether it was a 16
Ashley> sector or 12 sector RK05. Instead, it has a short, rounded,
Ashley> unnotched rim where normally it would have the tall thin rim
Ashley> with notches. Otherwise it looks just like an RK05. The
Ashley> case is interchangeable. I actually took it apart so I could
Ashley> use the case on another RK05 pack that had a decent platter
Ashley> but a bad outer case.
Ashley> What is this thing? RK03?
I have no idea, but here's a far out thought... some IBM 360
mainframes (the 360 model 44 for example) have an RK05 style drive in
them. Reading the 360 model 44 functional description (on
bitsavers.org) suggests that probably isn't right -- that disk (Model
2315) is described as having 16 fixed size sectors. Hm, that would
mean an RK08 pack would fit???
Strange to have hard sectoring here, given that IBM 360 mass storage
normally used variable-size records on a track.
paul
---
Jay R. Jaeger The Computer Collection
cube1(a)charter.net