29 Oct
2001
29 Oct
'01
9:58 a.m.
On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Ian Koller wrote:
speaking of ...
yes
To those dismayed at the mangulations of language
being
used by some people in email these days, this just goes
to show that there's nothing new under the sun. :-)
can anyone fill in the blanks here ...
IMHO - in my humble opinion
IMO - in my opinion
IIRC - if I recall correctly ? OTOH - on the other hand
FYI - for your information
IOW -
FWIW - for what it's worth
AFAIK -
as far as I know
WRT - with respect/regards to
ISTR -
TMK -
to my knowledge
ISTR -
SAS -
FAE -
FA -
DIY - Do it yourself
YMMV -
your mileage may vary
HMMV -
ECO - Engineering Change Order ?
AAMAF -
PITA -
pain in the ass
IPA -
TIA - Thanks In Advance
NG -
no good
NAOA - Not An Official Acronym
TTBOMK - to the best of my knowledge
I hate to admit it, but I haven't figured some of these out.
And just maybe someone else hasn't either? but wouldn't want
to be associated with asking any stupid questions?
Feel free to add any that you feel to be significant.
Greg Ewing wrote:
John Lawson:
FB OM YR SIGS 599 RPT 599 QSL VIA BURO TNX ES
73 DE KB6SCO
pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com (Pete Turnbull):
It's (mostly standard) radio ham CW
(continuous wave) abbreviations, used
to save keying too much morse.
To those dismayed at the mangulations of language being
used by some people in email these days, this just goes
to show that there's nothing new under the sun. :-)
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a |
Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. |
greg(a)cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+