ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell) wrote:
I would agree. I haev 3 or 4 pre-1975 Unibus
PDP11s, a PDP8/e, a Philips
P850 and an HP9830 (along with a couple of 9100Bs, a couple of 9810s and
a 9820 if you count those as computers).
I can forsee a world where computers are being saved, but peripherals
and special-purpose machines (calculators, industrial controllers,
sequencers, etc.) are not.
Why?
Well, they aren't computers. And we're all here talking about computers.
As I haev said many times on this list, my main interest is electronics.
Not computing per se. Sure I like computers, but I regard them as being
ingenious digital [1] electronic systems which happen to be programmable.
[1] As yet Iv'e not obtained an analogue computer, unless you count some
of the servo systems in my hard drives, which IMHO are dedicated analogue
comptuers.
And so I can see as much beauty and interest in, say, the motor
controller of a plotter as in some CPUs. This is one reason I prefer the
old TTL-built machines -- there is little to investigate when you have a
few large ICs connected together, espeically when you don't have proper
data on them. There's a lot more interest to me in a few boads of simple
ICs -- gates, flip-flops, and the like -- which I can understand and
watch the signals on the inputs and outputs.
So yes, I collect peripherals, calculators, odd bits of control systems
[2] and so on. And of course processors
[2] I haev part (most?) of the control system from some kind of Xray
defraction system (no, I don't have the 'optics'). It's patchboard
programmable, uses DM160s as status indicators, etc. The papertape I/O
uses the punch and reader from a fride flexowriter, mounted on 19" rack
panels, and with their own motors. The printer is based on a Victor
Comptometer adding machine with solenoids over the keys. I am not sure
I'll ever use it, but it seemed worth rescuing...
-tony