Hi,
Maciej mentioned "winding a tape past a medium error and read...".
I have several times successfully skipped past media errors on DDS-1
drives by doing a FSF (Forward Skip File ... tells drive to skip to the
next EOF). (Although, IIRC, once I encountered a read error, I couldn't
do that ... I recall having to 'sneak up' on the error by positioning
the drive to the prior EOF and then skipping forward. But since I haven't
done it for more than 10 year, maybe my memories are classic, er, rusty.)
My recollection is that DDS-1 (and perhaps -2?) had 'set marks' that
few people knew about, and even fewer ever used. The explanation
I recall is that the drive could do a "forward to next setmark" *much*
faster than "forward to next EOF". (BTW, when reading, a setmark
was reported like an EOF (although if you requested extra status you
could tell them apart).)
I never tried using the skip-to-next-setmark to get past errors,
partially because the tapes I was recovering years ago didn't have setmarks.
(Set marks are one reason I prefer my tape archiving format, since I record
them,
as well as retry information :)
Al: thanks for expanding my answer about cutting out a portion of the tape
... I'd forgotten about helical recording.
(Note that on ordinary multi-track tapes, cutting a section
does indeed lose data from n different places on the tape ...
any tape that requires multiple passes over the tape to get from BOT to
the full capacity of the tape.)
Stan