On 1/1/22 12:44 PM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
Could be. For the CDC case, I see actual 3-phase DC
supplies, i.e.,
3 phase bridge rectifiers fed by 3-phase transformers.
Interesting. That brings to mind 6? DC supplies. -- Two typical 3?
rectifier networks (making DC pulses be 60? apart) separated by a ? / Y
or Y / ? transformer inducing a 30? phase shift between them. Thereby
causing a net effect of 12 x DC pulses 30? apart.
If you run those off one phase the ripple would be a
lot larger.
Indeed.
And of course 400 Hz gave them an additional advantage
in reduced
transformer size and reduced ripple (for a given filter capacitor).
I was going to ask how the frequency altered the size of the ripple, but
"for a given filter capacitor" makes sense. You are messing with the
ratio and having a fixed value "for a given filter capacitor". -- If
I'm even remotely understanding correctly.
They'd do this even in devices that don't draw
large amounts of power,
for example the DD60 console display gets its power (other than fans
which are single phase mains power) from the 400 Hz 3-phase supply
feeding the mainframe. I'd be surprised if it uses even a kW, so
this was probably a case of "why not since it's there to be used".
My understanding is that some of the special power requirements had more
to do with isolation and cleanliness / quality of the power. Meaning
don't try to power the equipment off of the same circuit(s) that motors
and the likes are on which will induce lots of noise on the line, some
of which might make it into the computer and adversely effect things.
The motor / generator provides a quite strong isolation for things like
that. Probably more so than just a normal transformer.
The frequency change means that a simple isolation transformer won't
suffice. The higher frequency also has benefits of reducing the size of
other down stream components.
I find this to be interesting to learn, even if I'll almost certainly
never actually work near anything that uses it.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die