The 8051 Tiny BASIC could squeeze into 3K of memory;
http://www.chac.org/bas-51.html
Whereas the 8052 BASIC fit into 8K of memory;
http://www.geocities.com/dsa_projects/electronics/8031-ah/8952-bas.html
so I don't see that they are related. I've also never heard the 8052 version
referred to as a Tiny BASIC ( or Palo Alto BASIC ).
Best regards, Steven
But definitely not any relation to the interpreter found in the
8052AH-BASIC chip, though, right? Do you have any URLs handy?
-Dave
On Aug 11, 2008, at 6:09 PM, Scanning wrote:
> I've found numerous references to a MCS-51 Tiny BASIC for the 8051.
> Apparently it is 3 Kbytes so I would definitely put it in the Tom
> Pittman
> category for Tiny BASICs.
>
> Best regards, Steven
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave McGuire" <mcguire at neurotica.com>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only" <cctech at
classiccmp.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 12:41 PM
> Subject: Re: INS8073 (was Re: HERO1 For sale...)
>
>
>> Eric Smith wrote:
>>> It's in 2.5KB of ROM, so it's definitely a tinier BASIC than in the
>>> competing Intel 8051AH-BASIC and Zilog Z8671, both of which had
>>> 4KB of
> ROM.
>>
>> Was there in fact an 8051AH-BASIC? I've worked extensively with
>> 8052AH-BASIC, and have never heard of an 8051 version. The 8052
>> has 8KB
>> of ROM, compared to the 8051's 4KB. The BASIC interpreter
>> filled...and
>> I mean FILLED...that 8KB. It's extraordinarily dense code.
>>
>> The Z8671's BASIC, on the other hand, fits in the first 2KB of
>> ROM on
>> that chip.
>>
>> -Dave