14 Apr
2011
14 Apr
'11
6:34 a.m.
On 4/14/11 9:23 AM, Teo Zenios wrote:
But only for "personal" tasks?
Is your argument really that 100% of Photoshop's esoteric and
rarely-used features are always needed for every job that is considered
"professional" (again, whatever that means), and for that reason, anyone
who attempts to do anything without it is "foolish"? (yes, not YOUR
words, I know)
Seriously?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL
Really?
Anyone, in all cases of professional work (whatever that
means) would automatically be foolish to use something that's free
over paying hundreds of dollars for something that accomplishes about
95% of the same tasks?
I don't think I've heard a more concise description of "well-trained
American consumer" in my life.
For important work people need 100% of a task done to get paid. Mostly
that means using the standard software for that industry.
A high proportion of people don't need all the features most high end
apps have, or could use a much older version (which can be found cheaply
or free) to get the job done for personal tasks.