26 Nov
2018
26 Nov
'18
11:15 p.m.
On 21/11/2018 16:19, Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 9:34 AM Pontus Pihlgren via
cctalk <
cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
The original complaints were due to me being on holiday, and some
existing hitch with the list configuration which means some posts need
to be moderated through to cctalk (though it should have caught up now.)
But yes, the two lists are largely identical, though of course non-cc
stuff doesn't make it into cctech. Almost anything goes on cctalk as
most posts go through automatically anyway.
I think if everyone can refrain from posting non-cc stuff (and in this I
would include: Queries about modern HW or SW without a direct CC
relevance, long threads about character encoding schemes...) then we
could go to a single list, but one might have to get used to being
jumped on if posting something regarded as off-topic, and perhaps
finding oneself moderated if persisting.
Lawrence
--
Lawrence Wilkinson lawrence at ljw.me.uk
Ph +41(0)79 926 1036 http://www.ljw.me.uk
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 06:18:25AM -0800, Al
Kossow via cctalk wrote:
Not die so much as one become an alias of the other. I actually use them
both, depending on the nature of my question. Someone should run a set of
tests.
b
On 11/21/18 6:06 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk
wrote:
I agree!
I thought cctalk was supposed to be a complete
superset of cctech, but
looking at the cctech archives, I see a lot of posts that didn't make it
to cctalk. Does one need to do both to see everything?
Noel
Yes, unfortunately.
Most of the "removing PVA" thread never made it to cctlk
I think it's time for cctech to die.