27 Aug
2012
27 Aug
'12
3:25 p.m.
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Chuck Guzis wrote:
On 27 Aug 2012 at 13:25, Fred Cisin wrote:
The court didn't hold anything. A jury that couldn't be /bothered/ to even
read the jury instructions, let alone review any prior art, rushed to
"punish" Samsung (contrary to said jury instructions) and award Apple a
large sum. IMO that jury, and especially the jury foreman needs to be held
in contempt.
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2012082510525390
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120826/23534320161/applesamsung-jurors-a…
Alas, in the current "taste and smell"
times, . . .
What did Samsung copy from Apple?
The court held that Samsung infringed on an Apple patent--a very
different matter. Who did Apple buy the patent from?