I admit I bought a MacBook (two actually) for a couple reasons over a Wintel
laptop, not the least of which was the aesthetic consideration. There is no
doubt they are better looking IMO, and they have a nice uncluttered design. I
don't need a zillion different interfaces in/out of the thing. Seems like every
wintel laptop manufacturer out there wants to plaster a bunch of different
connectors all over the laptop for every conceivable interface type. These days,
USB is all I need. I think one thing that Apple really has an advantage over the
competition is their power brick design. Not only is it incredibly small, it has
that snazzy magsafe power connector, which has saved my laptop untold damage
(and that's after having owned an HP which I had to replace the power jack on).
The other big reason was OS X itself. I wanted to play with it, and it had the
advantage of having Xcode included with the OS, the dev tools for Windows costs
a lot (yeah yeah, Vis C++ Free Edition). I have been very happy with how turnkey
the OS is while still feeling professional, Time Machine is awesome, and
upgrading a hard disk (thanks to Time Machine) was very, very easy.
I think the 5-10% of things that I don't like about my MacBook (namely some case
weaknesses) have been addressed in the subsequent designs. Does everything I
need it to do. Is it the end all, be all? Nope, but I still really like it a
lot. YMMV.
________________________________
From: Daniel Seagraves <dseagrav at lunar-tokyo.net>
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Sent: Mon, October 4, 2010 8:10:17 AM
Subject: Re: iPad? Really? (was RE: Voice recognition will never kill the
keyboard was: Re: Evolution)
On Oct 4, 2010, at 7:42 AM, Jules Richardson wrote:
Tom Uban wrote:
As with many on this list, we have been using
computers pretty much since their
inception. And while
I too am typing this on a MacBook Pro, which I do like for the most part, my
experience with Apple
products is that they are about 90%. They get the basics right and the
potential for being really
great is there, but there are always a handful of gee wouldn't it be nice if
this application did
this, etc.
They could rule to world if only they could get past their smug sense of, "we
know your needs better than you do"...
Choice of device or operating system should be based on the intended user and
workload required. It's not a religion. Saying "I am typing this on a
mac..." to
qualify bashing someone for their choice is like saying "I have a few black
friends too..." to qualify racism. It's hollow and cliche and nobody believes
it. You just sound like a dope to everyone except other people who share your
bias.
I have a Mac and it pays my bills. When I go home I run Windows for playing
games. I have a Wii and a Playstation 3 and an iPhone, all of which are hacked
for various reasons. Here at work we have many Windows machines and many Linux
machines. Each item is picked for their intended task and workload. Some of
these workloads are more clearly defined than others, and some of them exist
just for entertainment value, but none of them is "better" than the others. You
can't say with any sort of accuracy that device X is stupid and useless in all
situations because you don't know every possible user/workload combination in
existence. Nor can you say that item X is better than item Y in all respects for
every workload because everything is designed differently by different people
for different goals. It's like saying a crescent wrench is always better than a
Vise Grip. They may look vaguely similar, they may have the same user in mind,
but they were designed with two different tasks in mind, so trying to compare
them and speak authoritatively about this comparison is flawed and
intellectually dishonest.