Popular Science article

Re: Being 'published'. IN previous lives, I have been interviewed dozens of times for print and video media. not once - NOT ONE TIME - has the entire article been 100% factual and/or accurate. They *always* have gotten something wrong, misquoted, fucked up - whatever. A good example is when I moved to India to work in the film business there. The Hindu - the largest-circulation paper in the country - like the NY Times or Times of London - came to talk to me about MGM and my own studio. They wanted pictures, which I had several of. By mistake, a shot of my PDP11 collection was in there too, and the reporter and photog were marvelling at what Yanks decorate their living rooms with. ;} Well, they ran the story about my studio, and of course, printed the pic of my racks of PDP11s. (I didn't know they even had it, nor did I get it back!!) I got email and phone calls for six months after that, mostly from professionals wanting to know A) what kind of audio gear was all that, or B) Just what kind of fools do you take us for - that's not a bloody Studio - I still have the article that I clipped - it's much the same picture (from a different angle) as the one in Christine Finn's book. Cheers John