16 Oct
2011
16 Oct
'11
3:10 p.m.
Fred Cisin wrote:
I never understood the populrity of that
approximation.
31415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164 /
10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
is more accurate.
If you encode the digits using something with more scope than characters
0..9, there's a lot less to memorize. ;-)