Richard Erlacher skrev:
WE are the ones who pay for SPAM, and WE are not the
ones who want it that
way. Perhaps rewriting the email protocols can fix that, but the place it
has to be worked out is in the IP/ICMP pair, among others, and in the TCP/UDP
pair. Tracking the actual bandwidth used by a SPAMmed message probably will
involve tunnelling protocols, which are normally avoided in order to preserve
the layered architecture. My own experience with SPAM has shown me that even
the application layer doesn't generally become aware of the actual source of
the mass-mailing. Nevertheless, the challenge is to find that source and
pass the cost back to him. It's not a priority today, because we're not
charged by the bit. People are charged for bandwidth usage in some
countries, however, so it's just a matter of time.
I'm using a modem, and as a matter of consequence I *am* charged by the bit,
since downloading 40 messages takes twice as much time as downloading 20.
--
En ligne avec Thor 2.6a.
Amiga 4000/040 25MHz/44MB/20GB RetinaBLTZ3/VLab/FastlaneZ3/Ariadne/Toccata