29 Jul
2008
29 Jul
'08
10:29 a.m.
On 29 Jul 2008 at 11:33, Jules Richardson wrote:
Heh. Certainly an interesting way of doing it -
presumably done to avoid
breaking existing tools that might be out there?
To be honest, I can't tell you why I did it that way. Probably for
compatibility's sake, but it's been too many years. I do recall
thinking that one could have TD tD Td and td as variations.
I'll try the latter lot first as they seem a
little more approachable - the
former look like they won't touch anyone who doesn't have a whole pile of
money to throw their way...
If they'll release me from the NDA that they inherited, I'm perfectly
content to release the source code to the public of any tools they
might have acquired (I've got every iteration since 1987). But I
have a very-well justified fear of lawyers, so not before then.
Certainly, any interest in floppies has to be marginal by now.
Cheers,
Chuck