20 Jun
2013
20 Jun
'13
4:18 a.m.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:36:21PM -0400, Mouse wrote:
Someone was recently telling me about some people trying to design a
successor to X. I was interested (X really does suck in a few
respects),
Yes, that sounds good so far - there are certainly enough warts in X.
until I heard it was abandoning the networkability
aspect;
that alone makes it not worth even finding out more about, to me.
And that kills it. Non network aware replacement for X? Not interested
at all, may your idea die a quick death.
Kind regards,
Alex.
--
"Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and
looks like work." -- Thomas A. Edison