Following top post of this reply...
There is a doc called 709-7090 General Information Manual D22-6508, which
I don't see in bitsavers (I don't have). The operator's guide for 7090
Data Processing System is A22-6535 is on bitsavers, but that's not going to
help you much. The big hole in the bitsavers collection for the 709-7090
is A22-6503, the 709-7090 Data Processing System Reference Manual. It's
kind of like Gordon Bell's book with a combination of hardware and
programming to explain how the system works. I think that's what you
want.
Maybe someone has a copy of this? If not I can scan mine. My 7090 is out
for repairs anyway so I don't need it at the moment. Those repair guys
don't move as fast as they used to.
Most of the rest of the docs I have related to 709-7090 are Fortran
related.
On the back pages of the 709/7090 Data Processing System Bulletins you'll
find a bibliography of all 709-7090 publications and their titles.
Bill
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 4:40 AM, Paul Birkel via cctech <
cctech at classiccmp.org> wrote:
Wonderful document. Thank you IBM Customer
Engineering!
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech [mailto:cctech-bounces at
classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Camiel
Vanderhoeven via cctech
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 4:01 AM
To: Noel Chiappa; cctech; cctalk at
classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Details about IBM's early 'scientific' computers
Have you really looked at everything that is on Bitsavers? It?s much more
than just the engineering manuals. If I may offer a suggestion, have a
look at this document and see if it fits your needs:
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/7090/ce/223-6895-1_7090_CE_
Reference_System
_Fundamentals_7100_7151_7606_Sep61.pdf
<http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/7090/ce/223-6895-1_7090_CE_Reference_System_Fundamentals_7100_7151_7606_Sep61.pdf>
Camiel
On 11/14/17, 4:32 AM, "cctech on behalf of Noel Chiappa via cctech"
<cctech-bounces at
classiccmp.org on behalf of cctech at classiccmp.org> wrote:
Please, everyone, I do actually know of BitSavers;
you don't need to
point me
at it.
When I said:
>> I could look at the engineering manuals, but I was hoping for
something
> in
between them and Bashe et al.
I assumed everyone would understand that by "engineering manuals", I was
meaning the kind of things one finds in BitSavers.
Noel