23 Apr
2012
23 Apr
'12
1:32 a.m.
On 2012 Apr 23, at 12:56 AM, Mouse wrote:
Probably not, as it was a fairly ridiculous argument from the outset.
I've
received more digital cameras to repair lately than 1960's
discrete-component calculators. Does that mean modern digital
cameras are less reliable than 1960s discrete calculators?
In case anyone still cares, in my case, the lesson from experience
still holds when corrected for such effects. Indeed, for several
years
I ran more machine-hours of Suns than peecees and I _still_ had more
peecee hardware failures.
What correction for what effect? Your [anecdote] is not particularly
surprising, nor do I see a contradiction.