I said "capable," not "theoretically
possible." 8-P
Oh, I know :) but it's nice to have a page you can point to. XP, for example,
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/home/upgrading/sysreqs.mspx
Piece of cake. Not much argument there about what would fall on which side of
the line.
I think using
a Windows-based boundary will be firmer and less ambiguous.
I agree, and that seems to be the most contentious part of this whole
definition of a "classic computer."
So do I. I could live with a Windows-based boundary as long as it was
carefully considered.
--
--------------------------------- personal:
http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ ---
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems *
www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at
floodgap.com
-- Remember, Windows is not a virus. Viruses actually do something. -----------