True. You have
to realise, though, that even for stuff I am going to use,
I prefer things I can repair. I know this is odd, but I would rather have
something that needs minor repairs every couple of years (like replacing
microswitches) but if I do that can carru on running for many years than
something that runs fine for 5 years and then fails in a way that I can't
fix.
Fair enough. And I do see where you're coming from, but for
something as pedestrian as a mass-market mouse, personally I don't go
that far. More power to you, though.
And if my mousebutton fails at a time when I need to get something done
_THEN_. I would rather have to kludge up a repalcement for a microswitch
-- if necessary 2 bits of wire that I could touch together -- than a
replacement for a custom IC.
will last
maybe a year or two and give limited functionality, or a more
expensive device that will last more likely a decade or more (I have
several decade-old expensive Apple optical mice) and give enhanced
And how many of those used capacitive sensors in place of switches?
None of course, but they all use imaging-based optical positioning
sensors rather than mechanical rollers, axles, and opto-interrupter wheels.
I think i'd prefer the optointerrupters... Although as my message asking
for data on an IS501 drives indicates, those optointerrupters can fail too...
-tony