Richard wrote:
In article <4421E162.3080902 at DakotaCom.Net>,
Don Y <dgy at dakotacom.net> writes:
Richard wrote:
In article <4421CB4A.1050600 at
DakotaCom.Net>,
Don Y <dgy at dakotacom.net> writes:
You want to be wary of medical surplus since you
have no idea
*what* it was used for... X-(
What's the concern? A computer is a computer.
I'm thinking more in terms of *medical* equipment.
I have no interest in medical equipment :-)
But many of these devices have lots of interesting electronics.
Unfortunately, those are often in the same environment as the
"field" electronics. So, whatever one was exposed to it is
likely that the *other* has been, as well.
E.g., I designed a device to track blood samples during
assays. I'd *love* to find one to add to my personal
collection. *But*, who knows *what* sorts of biohazards
it was exposed to! In theory, it's been sanitized, etc.
But, since you can't AUTOCLAVE the damn thing, I'm not
willing to take that risk just to satisfy my own personal
vanity... :-(
I once inherited an air pump from "surplus". Later,
discovered that the vacuum side of the pump had been used
to continuously sample air from a "biological experiment".
"Um, what was so *interesting* about the air that was
being sampled...?" :-(
The folks responsible for surplussing stuff are often
clueless about the safety issues involved. They just
want to move the stuff out....