6 Jun
2013
6 Jun
'13
11:05 a.m.
I always found the IBM version to be more stable than the micro$oft DOS.
That is my observation anyway, I have nothing other than personal
experience to back that up with.
I have archived:
/os/os-images/dos-win 679 # ls -1 ibm microsoft/dos
ibm:
IBM PC-DOS 1.0 (5.25).7z
IBM PC-DOS 1.10 (5.25).7z
IBM PC-DOS 2.0 (5.25).7z
IBM PC-DOS 2.1 (5.25).7z
IBM PC-DOS 3.0 (5.25).7z
IBM PC-DOS 3.1 (5.25).7z
IBM PC-DOS 3.2.7z
IBM PC-DOS 3.30 (5.25).7z
IBM PC-DOS 4.00 (3.5).7z
IBM PC-DOS 5.00 (3.5).7z
IBM PC-DOS 5.02 (3.5).7z
IBM PC-DOS 6.30 (3.5).7z
IBM PC-DOS 7.0 (3.5).7z
IBM PC-DOS 2000.7z
microsoft/dos:
dos33.zip
dos50.zip
dos60.zip
dos622.zip
/os/os-images/dos-win 680 #
On 06/ 5/13 02:20 PM, Cindy Croxton Electronics Plus wrote:
I have MS DOS 6.22, PC DOS 6.3 from IBM, and Win 3.1
or 3.11 with DOS 6.22.
Cindy Croxton