23 Feb
2004
23 Feb
'04
12:29 p.m.
Well, ...
not "Exactly!", since he was born in 1860, therefore it would be 35, not
39 (NB: 1900 was NOT a leap year)
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, David V. Corbin wrote:
Exactly!
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: cctalk-bounces(a)classiccmp.org
>>> [mailto:cctalk-bounces@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of
>>> blstuart(a)bellsouth.net
>>> Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 11:11 PM
>>> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
>>> Subject: Re: Hollerith (was: lk401 keyboard protocol?
>>>
>>> >> > > 39th? Shouldn't it be older than that?
>>>
>>> Methinks ol' Herman must have been born on February 29, 1848.
>>>
>>> Brian L. Stuart