6 Apr
2011
6 Apr
'11
2:46 a.m.
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:16:53AM -0700, Eric Smith wrote:
Pontus Pihlgren wrote:
I was being slightly sarcastic and presented what I think is the view
of PC Mag. (I should have learnt by now that sarcasm doesn't come across
very well in written text).
But I don't think the above computers where marketed towards the general
public which might be another reason for PC Mag to exclude them.. but I
guess it is just ignorance.
Regards,
Pontus.
Mind you, they weren't "Personal".
What wasn't personal about the MCM/70 or IBM 5100? They didn't run
batch or timesharing, but were dedicated to serving a single user at
a time interactively.