["MikeS" <dm561 at torfree.net>]
I happen to think that I not only have a legal right
to choose what
to do with what most people would consider worthless junk, but that
it's really none of your business.
Indeed. Until and unless you make it our business, such as by posting
on the list about it.
Unless you are also Steven Landon (and maybe even then - see below), or
unless you've pulled such a stunt in the past and I've lost track of
it, I don't see why _you_ are getting bent out of shape over this.
But your censure doesn't bother me one bit,
Nor should it, because it's not aimed at you...unless you are also
Steven Landon, of course. Possibly even then; see below.
Hm, actually, given the stance you take in your email, I think maybe it
_is_ aimed at you.
Not that you care, as you said.
and your turning a *Goodwill donation* of fairly
common junk into
'dissecting an ASR33 into party favors' just tells me something about
trying to discuss something with you...
If Goodwill's policy as described upthread is accurate, I don't see it
as that much of a stretch.
Of course, it may not be accurate, or even if it is the poster may not
have known about it (I'm speaking theoretically here). But the
response from someone who actually cares about the hobby instead of
about yanking others' emotional chains would have been more along the
lines of "oh $#!+, is that what they do? Then...", or perhaps
"actually, I asked them and the real policy here is...".
That's not what I'm seeing here.
Actually, what I saw from Steven Landon looked reasonable. The remark
about Goodwill came from a message I did not see directly, and the
quote was taken out of context enough I don't know how fair the
reaction was. I _have_ seen such `offers' in the past, though, and
they are what I was writing about, whether or not my remarks apply to
anything recent.
I used to think that when I get rid of something
people would
appreciate a heads-up before I scrap it,
In general, I think we do. But "if you want to rescue it I'm going to
make sure it costs you, even though I get nothing for it if you don't",
well, if/when that happens, I have trouble finding a term for it any
weaker than `emotional blackmail'.
Again, whether that's relevant depends on whether that was the
paradigm, which as I said above is uncertain from my point of view.
I dunno, I thought perhaps someone might be able to
use a part from
those systems I've scrapped,
If that were the actual motivation behind the offer, we'd be seeing
"free for pickup from $PLACE", not "$X and you pick it up, or it gets
trashed". Which is what I often see, and it was pretty close to what I
saw from Steven Landon. If you think my remarks are relevant to you, I
can only infer that you've made `offers' along those lines....
If you want it then buy it; if you don't and no
one else wants it
either then it's obviously not worth very much...
Lots of things lose value when they're out in the middle of Michigan;
it's an inconvenient enough place for me, for example, that I wouldn't
go there to pick a $100 banknote up off the ground.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at
rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B