On 8/17/10, Richard <legalize at xmission.com> wrote:
In article
<CC28F43ED4708D489ABCF68D06D7F556040A5CC9EA at 505DENALI.corp.vnw.com>,
Rich Alderson <RichA at vulcan.com> writes:
Arguing that anything before the PDP-8 was a
"minicomputer" is
revisionism.
IMAO.
I haven't been following this thread. What distinguishes a
minicomputer from the PDP-1? Is it the multiuser capability?
I'm a bit curious about the working definition, too. I'm by no means
an expert, but I would have thought that a machine that fell into the
"minicomputer" category would be based on its size and cost
substantially below (like 80-90% below) a mainframe, and interactive
vs batch as the primary method of use. Single-user vs multi-user is
not a defining element IMO. PDP-8s and PDP-11s were both available in
single-user and multi-user configurations (though multi-user PDP-11s
were more ordinary).
Leaving out VLSI machines of the 1970s ("micros") and focusing on the
1960s, I'd say that definition easily includes the PDP-8, about which
I think there is little dissent. I personally would have included the
PDP-1 as well - to me, it's "small" (4 cabinets plus peripherals?),
meant to be used interactively, and (relatively) cheap - $120K in 1960
dollars.
But it all depends on how you define "minicomputer" as to what
specifically falls in the category.
-ethan