On 12 Aug 2012 at 12:43, William Donzelli wrote:
Clones are never perfect in the real world. These
clones would not be
able to capture many of the subtle nuances of the manufacturing
processes of old. In many cases, clone makers take shortcuts, and may
not document these properly, nor understand the consequences.
I'll make one of the arguments I often make with the music people who
insist on "authentic performance" of old music (e.g. Renaissance,
Baroque, Classical).
The least perfect instrument used in a recreation is the audience.
We have been conditioned by our own time to the extent that our
notions of rhythm, harmony and even tuning. The old tunings sound
strange to us; we have no idea how Bach or Mozart performed their
works--all we can do is guess. And we guess with our own ears
conditioned by our own modern experiences.
All we can hope for is to capture a ghost of the experience.
The same obtains, I suspect, with attempting to create a authentic
experience with old iron. Today's audience has grown up in a world
where the computer's presence penetrates every corner of existence.
To the user of a 7090, computers were rare things. Watching a
printer create printed output from instructions punched into cards
was magical. The 7090 was FAST for the time--now, even the lowliest
mobile phone has a faster CPU.
To someone born yesterday, can a really authentic old iron experience
ever be created? I doubt it.
--Chuck