Apple LWPro parallel port?

No no... wasn't it, if this OS min 128MB is required, count on it to work best at 256M or more, that is my experience on this. Snort, Correct, But behind that, M$ hopes they could snare hapless buyers with their crap and amirably succeeded. That's very minimum specs, I find Pentium 100 or 486DX4 w/ 48MB is about right for win95 to run software apps acceptably, best chipset and cache is a must. That was same specs I had on mine for 2 years before I moved up to PII 350 /w 64MB couple yr ago, now retired very recently for duron 800, new GeForce2 MX and win98, this time wasn't OS, it was one of my game demanded that move and prices was right. Btw: that minimum specs for win95 is also not enough for win311, it likes 8 or 16MB, 386DX 25 w/ good cache required or so even better 486, external cache optional. 386sx is a bogus!! Yet it works but bogus would-be 386dx shackled to a updated 286 design chipsets. Very rare 386sx boards has cache that made all the difference but still, that memory bandwidth plus 386sx was designed around slow memory timings, both took serious hits on overall performance. I tried to do this on a 386sx notebook has 2 way 4K cache, 10MB ram running X on linux couple of years ago and 486slc2 50 (cyrix) on win95. Both crawled and would crash n' burn often, everything solved upgrading to real straight and through 32bitness designs like 386dx or 486 and up. This is not only ones, many makers of all kinds including sun, apple turned out few weirdo boxens with too many corners cut. Examples: Apple's 6100 series and few of their models as well. When I throught having ppc motherboard to swap that 610's board with this is ultra cool and on the cheap till I found out having video card is required to get good performance on 6100's. Bah!! Bad news I have couple 610's none other motherboards is designed to fit in those cases other than 6100 or 610 boards. Cheers, Wizard