19 Apr
1997
19 Apr
'97
5:43 a.m.
On Fri, 18 Apr 1997, Brett wrote:
Aw come on! Think about it 8-)
Thinking? I'm running out of brain cells. I predict that by the end of my
final exams next week, I'll be so brainless that I'll even like being the
manager of immense software companies making GUIs and calling them operating
systems. :-)
Anyway, it wouldn't have helped! I was making the wrong assumptions.
The media MUST be able to pack bits closer. (Higher
density)
Even at higher spindle speeds you have to flip the dipoles.
You use higher current in the record head to get a bigger signal
out of the read head.
You do that be using a polished and *harder* (magnetically) medium.
The old soft style head can not successfully record and the read
head gain is too low the successfully read.
*NOW* I know. :-) I was under the impression that the media simply had
higher resolution. The way you put it, it's obvious.
It really is a good thing I still have a lot of DD diskettes at home.
I'm sure I could locate tons more if I need them -- old PC users usually
have loads of them. Most would be pleased to `part' with that old `junk'
(sic), especially if they get money for it.
--------------------------- ,o88,o888o,,o888o. -------------------------------
Alexios Chouchoulas '88 ,88' ,88'
alexios(a)vennea.demon.co.uk
The Unpronouncable One ,o88oooo88ooooo88oo, axc(a)dcs.ed.ac.uk