What about all the notes you've made of the
modifications you've effected
They are, of course, in the appropriate service manuals, etc.
Ok, are those service manuals inside the machines you modified? How can
Of course not.
you be sure they never be separated from the machines?
I cna't. I can be darn sure I'll never separate them, and I've told the
guy who gets my collection if I snuff it that he must check all service
manuals and other docs for my notes.
YEs, it's quite possible the documentation will get lost. I alas consider
this to be a necessary evil of keeping these machines useful and operational.
So, if Jules decides they want to exhibit the 5155 (i.e. USE it) he can't
make modifications to it that he considers making it more "useable"
If it was a mod that made it more usable, then I'd agree....
If that monitor was assembled with screws that were impossible to remove
non-destructively, then I would have no problem with drilling them out
and replacing them with something else since the monitor needs repair. If
the delivery time on a Bristol Spline key was 1 year or something, then
considering Jules has already removed the screws with pliers, I guess he
should order the tool, put the monitor back together with normal screws
for the time being (given that documentation is not hard to preserve for
1 year), and when the tool arrives, put the original screws back in.
But, darn it, the right tool is not hard to obtain, there is no good
reason for not keeping the original screws.
No "good" reason that you can fathom at
least. And let's compare bananas
to bananas here: Jules is not doing a 640K mod on the 5155 (if he was,
would you object? After all, he is making what you would consider a
No, I'd have no problem with that, provided it was documented as such (a
paint dot on each of the replaced ICs is the conventional way to indicate
such changes I think, along with paper documentation of what was changed
and why, and the date). In fact I would recomend doing that modification
if it's not already been done, it was a common mod when the machine was
current, it lets you run a lot more software on it.
"useful" modification) he's swapping
screws: a completely non-permanent,
easily reversible, and (if reversed) non-detectable alteration. You're a
hobbyist hacker making practical (extensive) alterations. He's an
archivist making practical (minimal, non-permanent, easily reversible)
alterations. BIG DIFFERENCE.
My comment is, and has always beem, that an archivist, and for that
matter anyone else, should not make a modification unless there's a darn
good reason for it. Not wanting to buy the right tool is not a good reason.
-tony