20 Apr
2010
20 Apr
'10
5:52 a.m.
Richard wrote:
"Dump" is right.
Without an explanation of the schema this isn't very useful.
It's not that bad. The data model is pretty simple (I count only 11
tables) and the field names are reasonably descriptive. It wouldn't be
too hard to make sense of it.
The blog post announcing the dump hinted that some kind of description
of the database would follow, as would documentation of the various
code and scripts. This was last October though, so I'm not holding my
breath.
Cheers,
--
Steve Maddison
http://www.cosam.org/