4 Feb
2003
4 Feb
'03
8:37 a.m.
Personally, I find the [list name] tag to be annoying and redundant... I can
see what list the message is from based on the To: header easily enough, thank
you :-)
Jay West said:
People wrote...
- Dan Wright
(dtwright(a)uiuc.edu)
(http://www.uiuc.edu/~dtwright)
(UNIX Systems Administrator, School of Chemical Sciences)
(333-1728)
Yes, please... *every* other maillist I
subscribe to has [mailistname]
prepended to the "Subject" field...except for Classiccmp, which generates
three times the message traffic the others do combined...
I personally prefer to have the listname in the subject field [cctech] for
example. I really can't say way, I just like it that way. Maybe it's because
every list I have ever been on has it that way, and we all know how prone
people are to think the first way is the "best way" *GRIN*.
That being said - this has come up for discussion several times in the past,
and pretty much the majority of people said don't put it in so I left it
out. However, if the majority opinion has changed, I'd be happy to add it
back. Tis up to you folks! :)
Jay West