5 Oct
2007
5 Oct
'07
3:02 p.m.
On 05/10/2007, Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com> wrote:
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
No, not directly, but if it runs real actual Windows, even in a VM,
then Windows is the same old malware-magnet it is running natively.
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/GoogleTalk/Orkut: lproven at gmail.com
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 ? Cell: +44 7939-087884 ? Fax: + 44 870-9151419
AOL/AIM/iChat: liamproven at aol.com ? MSN/Messenger: lproven at hotmail.com
Yahoo: liamproven at yahoo.co.uk ? Skype: liamproven ? ICQ: 73187508
It's just a shame when until the MacIntel
transition, even big beefy G5s
could still run many ancient Mac 128K-era apps (I still like to play Zero
Gravity from time to time, which is actually quite playable despite the
speed disparity -- probably a testament to very good programming). Running
code in Basilisk II just isn't the same.
. . . and the incompatabilities have been solved, so that "modern" Macs
can now run malware intended for Windoze?