Again, I try to limit my input to discussions
that
may result in an answer
not previously obtainable. In most cases, the
technical discussions on this
list are of this ilk. In this particular case,
there is a simple, easy
solution, and there's ample documentation on how
it's done. It got entirely
ignored until I pointed it out more bluntly.
I'm not aware of any documentation you bluntly
pointed out, and even looked throgh the archive. Like
you said, it's a freakin' Tandy 2000. If someone's not
inclined to spend $100, they'll ask for some info on
how to do it more reasonably (read sensibly). Their
time is to do with as they please.
I've noticed a number of messages here recently where people are getting
(IMHO) unfair criitism doing something in a particular way.
For most (if not all) of us here, classic computers are a hobby. We work
on them because we enjoy it. And nobody has the (moral) right to tell me
what I should or should not enjoy. Period. All that's important in that
respect is that my hobby does not adversely affect others.
If somebody wants to spend many weeks designign and building something
that thaey couuld buy ready-made for $100, that's their busienss. For
some of us, $100 _is_ a considerable amount of money, not something we
can spend without thinking about it. And yet we have plenty of time to
tinker with such things.
And of course the experience and education gained by designing and
building something is often worth a lot.
I can assure you that if I had a T2000 (I wish...) and didn't have the
original monitor, I would not buy some undocuemtned [1] module to attempt
to link up a more modern monitor. After all, that module was presumably
not intneded to work at T2000 scan rates anyway, so it might not work
correctly. No, I'd either design my oown scan converter, or modify a
monitor to work at T2000 rates.
[1] I have yet to see a 'scan doubler' that came with proper
documentation. I'm not just moaning about a lack of schematics (as
usual), but I've not even seen one that comes with proper specifications
of the inputs and outputs.
> This start-all-over-and-hack-something mentality is
> as silly as shutting off
It's about as stupid as always having somebody else do the work and not
learning anything about the problem or its solution. No thanks!
-tony