-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at
classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-
bounces at
classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Brian Lanning
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 1:45 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Wired Article, On Jan 19, 1983 Apple unveils Lisa
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Rich Alderson <RichA at vulcan.com>
wrote:
>
From:Christian Liendo
> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 12:56 PM
> Subject: Wired Article, On Jan 19, 1983 Apple unveils Lisa
From: Ian King
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 1:19 PM
Does this guy not know how to spell
"Alto"?
He is, after all, writing for *_WiReD_*.
Tesler's comment regarding Smalltalk vs. the Star hardware argues in
favor of
an Alto influence, but the team probably saw both
the Star and the
Alto at
PARC.
I've always heard the story told the way the article reads... that
apple stole from xerox and microsoft stole from apple, who sued
microsoft, etc. I'm always left wondering why xerox didn't stomp on
both of them.
Maybe Xerox's lawyers were smarter and recognized that a 'look and feel'
lawsuit was stupid. (The fact that later decisions legitimized the 'look and
feel' theory to some extent does not change my opinion that it is stupid precedent.)
After all, think about the Intel vs. NEC suit over the V20. NEC created a chip that
"looked like a duck, quacked like a duck, etc." NEC was found faultless because
they did not copy Intel microcode or masks: they built their own "duck" that
looked and quacked the same way. In even less guileful fashion, both Apple and Microsoft
took ideas arguably available from Xerox's publications and demonstrations and built
their own products upon them.
I have always considered Apple's suit against Microsoft to have been a nuisance suit
pure and simple, but then IANAL.... -- Ian