17 Nov
2012
17 Nov
'12
8:17 p.m.
On 17/11/12 7:52 PM, John Many Jars wrote:
On 18 November 2012 00:18, Toby Thain<toby at
telegraphics.com.au> wrote:
Well, yes, the use case for C is a bit stronger for a bytecode interpreter.
But not so much for the compiler to bytecode - is Ruby's actually
written in C?
--Toby
Most modern language compilers are written in
their own language, actually.
I hear you, but in this case it isn't... it also isn't compiled, but
interpreted. It's a "scripting language".