2048x1536 (with is 4 1024x768 areas on the same glass) is what I use on some
of my 21"/22" monitors.
Even the lower cost ones do 1920x1440 without a problem...
Check these links for the specs....
My "standard development monitor:
http://www.viewsonic.com/products/desktopdisplays/crtmonitors/graphicseries/
g220fb/ [about $500]
Good Dual Monitor Controller Card...
http://www.ati.com/products/radeon9800/aiw9800pro/specs.html [About $300]
Or For 3-D work [single monitor only]
http://www.ati.com/products/radeonx800/specs.html [About $500]
1600x1200 [not 1280 which you may be confusing with 1280x1204] is what I run
on my 17" screens.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cctalk-bounces(a)classiccmp.org
>> [mailto:cctalk-bounces@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of der Mouse
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 2:44 PM
>> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
>> Subject: Re: <Silly> RE: Help with question about web page access
>>
>> >> (It's also why I loathe black-on-white for computer
>> displays - I find
>> >> it fine for reflective technologies, such as ink on
>> paper, but horrid
>> >> for self-luminant technologies, such as all computer
>> displays I've
>> >> seen.)
>> > With respect to CRT (and all other self luminant
>> displays) I find that
>> > the contrast issue really depends on the pixel size. When I am
>> > running 2048x1536 here. A black backround with white
>> text is horrid
>> > [assuming a 1-3 pixel stroke width for text] Black on
>> white is great.
>>
>> I've never seen a CRT running 2048x1536. But I've seen
>> 1600x1280, and based on that, I suspect that your problem
>> is that you're pushing the monitor beyond what it can
>> actually do - and under those circumstances, thin vertical
>> strokes tend to get lost, which does damage W-on-B worse
>> than it does B-on-W.
>>
>> I had a monochrome monitor (= no shadow mask, and therefore
>> dot pitch limited only by intensity control electronics
>> bandwidth) that was great at 1600x1280, but unfortunately
>> it dimmed into unusability. I've yet to see a colour
>> screen that was any good at that sort of resolution - I'm
>> told they exist but are expensive. (I'd be willing to
>> believe that a good 2048x1536 screen could exist, but I'd
>> expect it to be _very_
>> expen$ive....)
>>
>> A single-pixel vertical line and a single-pixel horizontal
>> line should appear about equal brightness, white-on-black.
>> If one appears visibly dimmer than the other, then
>> something is being pushed beyond what it can really do, and
>> you will have legibility problems - but the real problem is
>> pushing the hardware; using white-on-black just makes it
>> somewhat more visible.
>>
>> /~\ The ASCII der Mouse
>> \ / Ribbon Campaign
>> X Against HTML mouse(a)rodents.montreal.qc.ca
>> / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B