10 Apr
2013
10 Apr
'13
7:07 a.m.
On 04/09/2013 08:05 PM, Terry Stewart wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Jecel Assumpcao Jr. <jecel at
merlintec.com>wrote:
But at least this page justifies a little why they are listed...
--
--- Dave Woyciesjes
--- ICQ# 905818
--- AIM - woyciesjes
--- CompTIA A+ Certified IT Tech - http://certification.comptia.org/
--- HDI Certified Support Center Analyst - http://www.ThinkHDI.com/
Registered Linux user number 464583
"Computers have lots of memory but no imagination."
"The problem with troubleshooting is that trouble shoots back."
- from some guy on the internet.
To complement the thread "The ten SEXIEST
computers of ALL TIME * The
Register", we have
http://www.chassis-plans.com/blog/2013/04/04/the-worst-computers-of-all-tim…
Any such list is necessarily very subjective, but I can think of lots of
machines that were worse than the ones indicated here. And not all of
them would be consumer computers either - just because you paid a lot
for something didn't mean it would be good.
Still, I liked the presentation.
-- Jecel
Yes, as you say these lists are pretty shallow and highly subjective. The
problem when people talk about "worst" what does that actually mean? Worst
keyboard, worst computer to repair, worst reliability, worst supported,
worst value for money...the list goes on.
Terry (Tez)