12 Jun
2009
12 Jun
'09
9:08 a.m.
2009/6/12 Pontus Pihlgren <pontus at update.uu.se>:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 08:40:19AM -0700, Cameron
Kaiser wrote:
As far as I know, VMware still doesn't use the hardware emulation in
modern Intel & AMD chips. They firmly believe that their own approach
is more powerful and offers better performance.
I believe VirtualBox also has its own, different approach to x86
virtualisation, involving forcing Ring 0 code in guests into the
seldom-used-on-x86 Ring 1, whereas user code normally runs in Ring 3
or something. I am not an expert in the minutiae of this stuff, I'm
afraid.
(Although when I interrogated Connectix about VirtualPC about 10y back
(with my journalist hat on) they were so thrown by my deep-tech
questions that they flew Jon Garber, the Connectix founder and chief
scientist, over the Britain to talk to me. That was fun and very
interesting indeed.)
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/GoogleTalk/Orkut: lproven at gmail.com
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 ? Cell: +44 7939-087884 ? Fax: + 44 870-9151419
AOL/AIM/iChat/Yahoo/Skype: liamproven ? LiveJournal/Twitter: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com ? ICQ: 73187508
I agree, but then there's also the dividing
line between a VM and
virtualization. Actually, I'm not surprised to hear that some emulation
had to be done for x86 originally -- the ISA certainly doesn't lend itself
well to virtualizing out of the box ;-)
Someone told me that VMware still emulates some of the instructions that
could be virtualized either because they are buggy or slow. Don't take
my word for it though.